Function spans the file
A clinic visit, an activity report and a work attempt describe different settings. Their details need to stay connected without becoming interchangeable.
Social Security Disability
Bring medical visits, daily activities and source opinions into one cited evidence report. Keep the person’s function, treatment barriers and relevant periods in view.
For disability attorneys, representatives, paralegals and medical or vocational reviewers
The work behind the review
A clinic visit, an activity report and a work attempt describe different settings. Their details need to stay connected without becoming interchangeable.
Adult, child and transition records describe different stages. Later evidence does not automatically explain an earlier period.
An assessment keeps its author, date, basis and qualifications. A different account needs to remain visible beside it.
Built around the evidence
A detailed chronology, with evidence views that keep the wider context close.
Sections without evidence in the supplied records are left out. Each report ends with a source index and review notes on questions between sections. These are MediChro's report views, not a required professional format.
The person, documented claim events and relevant periods, with uncertain dates kept visible.
A detailed sequence of encounters, findings, investigations, treatment and follow-up.
Physical, mental and sensory function, daily activities and sustained activity, with assistance, setting, frequency and source estimates.
Actual job demands, work history and attempts, including support and the documented outcome.
Childhood evidence organized across the six domains, without making a domain-level finding.
Development, education and support across home, school and other documented settings.
Medical-source statements and prior administrative medical findings, with their sources, periods and stated basis, without weighing them.
Documented treatment response, medication effects and reasons for interrupted or limited access.
When the hearing view is added: procedural history, testimony, vocational hypotheticals with their full assumptions, and representative positions.
When the continuing-review view is added: the prior favorable decision and its basis compared with later evidence, without deciding improvement.
Unreadable or missing referenced content, unresolved date, identity or attribution differences, and material not confidently placed.
Each document you uploaded, with its page count, and review notes on points to check against the records.
When you create a report, you choose an adult, child, age-18 transition, or mixed or unclear view, and you can add a hearing view and a continuing-review view. Together these give 7 to 11 profile sections, plus the closing Source Index and Review Notes, so 8 to 12 sections in all; the twelve shown here are the full profile. The order of the profile sections follows the chosen view.
What gets captured
Relevant detail is organized for this profile, while dates, source roles and uncertainty keep their meaning.
Activities keep the help, breaks, pace and circumstances that make them meaningful. An isolated task is not converted into sustained work capacity.
Earlier and later evidence remains tied to its dates. Adult, developmental and transition periods retain their context.
Response, reported effects and access difficulties stay alongside the care history. A gap is not treated as a choice or as recovery.
Source assessments retain their author, question, period, reasoning and qualifications. Representative proposals and other programs’ decisions stay attributed.
Evidence, not determinations
MediChro organizes the record. Your attorneys and reviewers verify the sources and make the decisions.
It organizes supplied evidence without deciding disability, onset, insured status, medical improvement or the outcome of a claim.
Recorded functional findings and opinions stay attributed. It does not originate an RFC, classify past work or SGA, find transferable skills, generate jobs or label treatment noncompliance.
It does not apply listing criteria, decide medical equivalence or turn childhood evidence into domain ratings.
The report is a draft for source verification, not a legal argument, filing-ready brief or certification of a complete record.
A look inside
A short fictional example, with each entry tied to its source page.
Explore the sample report (Personal Injury)SAMPLE CASE 024
At a doctor’s visit, the patient reported on-and-off lower back pain. The doctor discussed physical therapy.
S001 · p. 12At a physical therapy visit, the patient said long periods of sitting were painful. The notes don’t say for how long.
S002 · pp. 3-5One fictional example, to show how citations work. Your report uses the sections for your case type.
Sample data
No. The profile organizes the supplied records for your team’s review. It does not decide eligibility, create an RFC assessment, apply listing criteria or resolve the weight of competing opinions.
Yes. You choose an adult, child, age-18 transition, or mixed or unclear view for the report. The age-18 view uses the adult sections; mixed or unclear includes adult and child sections without deciding which standard applies. Periods and settings stay separate, and the evidence decides which sections have content.
The report retains documented reasons, access barriers and uncertainty. A missing encounter does not independently establish no symptoms, no treatment or a refusal of care.
No. The view you choose and the optional hearing and continuing-review views decide which sections are included, from 7 to 11. Sections with no supporting evidence are left out.
The hearing view keeps procedural history, testimony and each vocational question with its full assumptions, without generating jobs or job numbers. The continuing-review view compares later evidence with the documented prior favorable decision, without deciding improvement or cessation. Claim paperwork is not required, and missing claim dates are never invented.
Turn thousands of pages into a clear, cited chronology.